The Trump Administration terminated the DARPA/NASA DRACO nuclear thermal propulsion program in 2025, cancelling the $499M Lockheed Martin + BWXT contract. Three months later, the White House OSTP released a new National Initiative for American Space Nuclear Power — shifting focus from nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) to nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) as the primary development track, with a lunar fission surface power variant as the near-term priority.
Near-term priority under the April 14, 2026 OSTP directive. NASA directed to initiate the program within 30 days. Mid-power space reactor with lunar variant as the first deployment target. 2030 target timeline.
Replaced NTP/DRACO as the primary propulsion development track under the new OSTP initiative. Uses nuclear-generated electricity to power ion or Hall-effect thrusters for cislunar and deep-space missions. New contracts not yet awarded.
DARPA exploring a new nuclear electric program for orbital operations. Air Force Research Laboratory JETSON program — contracted to Lockheed Martin, Westinghouse Government Services, and Intuitive Machines — targets persistent nuclear power for USSF space domain awareness. Full scope classified.
Space nuclear programs face the same fuel bottleneck as terrestrial advanced reactors: High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) at 19.75% enrichment. The US currently has no commercial HALEU supply chain at scale. Without domestic enrichment, the entire Space Nuclear Circuit depends on the same choke point as the DOE Pilot companies.
BWXT received a separate $1.5B NNSA contract for domestic uranium enrichment centrifuge capacity — directly supporting both the space program and the terrestrial advanced reactor fuel supply chain. This is the most significant domestic enrichment investment in decades.
Space nuclear systems are regulated under the Atomic Energy Act and authorized by the Department of Energy — not the NRC. Presidential authorization is required for each launch under existing interagency review processes (INSRP).
This is a strategic advantage: the space program moves on DOE/DoD timelines, not the multi-decade NRC licensing track. The regulatory clock is faster — but the political and safety review is no less rigorous.